Article Highlights:
- Equitable Ownership
- Who Qualifies as an Equitable Owner?
- Tax Implications of Being an Equitable Owner
- Mortgage Interest Deduction
- Property Tax Deduction
- Examples of Equitable Ownership
- Examples Where Taxpayers Were Not Equitable Owners
Equitable ownership is the state in which a person has all the rights and obligations associated with property ownership, even in cases when they do not legally own the property. The goal of equity law, which is to attain justice and fairness, is the foundation of this idea. Legal ownership, in which a person or organization possesses the legal title, is sometimes contrasted with equitable ownership.
Simply said, an equitable owner has a beneficial interest in the property, which entitles them to all of the benefits of ownership, including the ability to use it, generate revenue from it, and take on maintenance and tax obligations. They do not, however, own the official legal title, which is usually owned by another individual.
Who Qualifies as an Equitable Owner?
To determine whether an individual qualifies as an equitable owner, several factors are considered. The Tax Court has outlined specific criteria to assess whether a taxpayer possesses the benefits and burdens of ownership. These criteria include:
- Right to Possess and Use the Property: The individual must have the right to possess the property and enjoy its use, rents, or profits.
- Duty to Maintain the Property: The individual must be responsible for maintaining the property, including repairs and upkeep.
- Responsibility for Insuring the Property: The individual must be responsible for insuring the property against risks such as damage or loss.
- Bearing the Property's Risk of Loss: The individual must bear the risk of loss associated with the property, such as damage or depreciation.
- Obligation to Pay Property Taxes and Assessments: The individual must be obligated to pay property taxes, assessments, or other charges related to the property.
- Right to Improve the Property: The individual must have the right to make improvements to the property without the owner's consent.
- Right to Obtain Legal Title: The individual must have the right to obtain legal title to the property at any time by paying the balance of the purchase price.
These criteria help establish whether an individual has a sufficient level of control and responsibility over the property to be considered an equitable owner.
Tax Implications of Being an Equitable Owner
Significant tax ramifications result from equitable ownership, especially when it comes to the deductibility of property taxes and mortgage interest. People who prove equitable ownership are eligible for tax deductions that they would not otherwise receive if they were not regarded as owners. In part because of tax court judgments, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) permits taxpayers to deduct property taxes and mortgage interest if they are deemed the equitable owners of the property.
Mortgage Interest Deduction
In accordance with IRS standards, a taxpayer may write off interest paid on a mortgage on real estate they own either legally or equitably. This implies that if a person satisfies the requirements for equitable ownership, they can still deduct the interest even if they are not personally accountable for the mortgage.
Property Tax Deduction
Equitable owners are entitled to a deduction for the property taxes they pay, just like they are for mortgage interest. Whether or not the individual is responsible for paying property taxes is the crucial aspect.
Examples of Equitable Ownership
- Binding Purchase Agreement and Occupancy Agreement: In the Tax Court case of Uslu, Saffet (TC Memo 1997-551), the taxpayer acquired ownership of a home using a "occupancy agreement" while financing was still being arranged. According to the terms of the occupation agreement, the taxpayer was in charge of getting contents and liability insurance as well as utility payments. Following a two-month transitional period, the taxpayer was also responsible for appliance, HVAC, plumbing, and electrical repairs. The Tax Court found that these obligations adequately transferred the costs and advantages of ownership to the taxpayer, establishing them as an equitable owner and allowing them to claim a mortgage interest deduction.
- Living on the Property and Paying Expenses: Although the taxpayer's son was the property's legitimate owner in Njenge, Ndile G. (TC Summary Opinion 2008-84), he did not live there. The taxpayer paid all costs and taxes while residing on the property. The taxpayer, not the son, took on the role of landlord when the property was turned into a rental, arranging for a renter and handling all associated duties. According to the Tax Court's ruling, the taxpayer is the only one with the burden and benefit of ownership, making them the rightful owner and entitling them to a deduction for their property taxes.
- A contribution to the down payment and mortgage payments: In Edosada, Conrad (TC Summary Opinion 2012-17), the taxpayer was neither the owner of the property title or the mortgage obligation. Still, the taxpayer took up residence in the house, made a sizable down payment, and committed to paying the entire mortgage. The Tax Court found that the taxpayer became an equitable owner as a result of these acts.
Examples Where Taxpayers Were Not Equitable Owners
- No Beneficial Interest in the Property: In Daya, Gabriel (TC Memo 2000-360), the sons of the taxpayers shared a home with their uncle and father, which they lived with their parents. The sons had no ownership stake in the property, had not made any payments for the previous 12 years, and had not contributed to the down payment. The sons were found to be neither equitable owners nor to have a beneficial interest in the property by the Tax Court.
- No Right to Use or Possession of the Property: In Puentes, Lourdes (TC Memo 2013-277), the taxpayer did not take on any ownership or benefit obligations with respect to a house that her brother lawfully owned. She paid the mortgage to support her brother, but she was unable to prove that she was entitled to the property, to use it, or to be responsible for its upkeep. The Tax Court came to the conclusion that the taxpayer lacked equitable ownership.
Equitable ownership, which permits people to claim tax deductions for mortgage interest and property taxes even if they do not have the formal title, is a key idea in property law and tax planning. Individuals can establish themselves as equitable owners by satisfying certain requirements, such as having the right to own and use the property, being accountable for upkeep and insurance, and accepting the risk of loss.
Taxpayers may optimize their tax benefits and make well-informed judgments regarding property ownership by having a thorough understanding of equitable ownership and its tax consequences. Establishing equitable ownership can offer significant tax benefits, whether via signing a legally enforceable purchase agreement, paying for real estate costs, or making mortgage payments.
If you have any inquiries concerning equitable ownership, kindly get in touch with our office.
